Love = boring

Logan asked if I would also be writing about love here, since she noticed it is not on my list of potential topics. I was surprised to realize my answer was probably not, that I’m not really interested in writing about love, especially not love in a romantic/sexual relationship (the ways I fall in and out of being in love in my romantic friendships seem like a more likely topic, what love means in that context). I’m just not particularly interested in analyzing or deconstructing it. I actually think love, as a topic, is kind of boring. Which is odd for two reasons:

1. I generally want to analyze every possible topic. I was raised by a progressive educator who believed that you can develop any skill through any entry point, so why not pick as many entry points as possible (somehow this did not include tv, which just rots your mind, in my mother’s view). She also didn’t believe in being bored - meaning, literally, that if I told her I was bored in school she told me it was my job to find a way to make it interesting. Elementary school was basically a constant oscillation for me between being academically bored and socially terrified, so I quickly learned how to pick apart and problematize everything to at least make the boredom sort of go away. This all happened in my head, since I never spoke in school as a kid. It did make me a great student, though I’m not sure it’s a very good survival tool for life and I think it helps me only slightly more than it hurts me as an interpreter. But anyway, I am shocked that I am bored by the topic of love.

2. I am, as we speak, in love with Logan, the one who asked me the question that started this post. Does saying that I find the topic of love uninteresting make it sound like I’m not really in love? I think it does, I’m worried it does. But what is there to say about it that isn’t kind of insipid and bragging? Logan and I send each other an enormous number of text messages, which my phone saves in one long file as if they are a instant messenger conversation. I hope no one ever sees this file, which now stretches over the last 5 months, but if someone did find it, I’d be less embarrassed for them to read the parts where I tell Logan in detail exactly how I want to fuck her (or be fucked) than if they read the whole days (weeks!) where the messages are just pure, saccharine, mush.

I do not think falling in love (or being in a romantic/sexual relationship) is a kind of success. I try to almost never ask friends if they are dating anyone, because I think asking is a kind of pressure (i.e.: this is valuable enough that I should ask about it) and an implication that they are not successful unless they are dating someone. (I am happy to listen if they want to talk about it though.) I am as uninterested in talking about love as I am in talking about happiness.

But the point of the title of this blog is that nothing is definite and unchanging. Maybe in a few months I will suddenly think love is fascinating and worth writing about. In the past I’ve been pretty bored by the idea of talking about how relationships work too, but my struggling and apparent resistance to being in a relationship has suddenly made that topic pretty fascinating.

3 Responses to “Love = boring”

  1. I was totally with you until “I am as uninterested in talking about love as I am in talking about happiness.” I think happiness is fabulously important and should be valued more, which maybe seems silly considering that on a superficial level our society seems obsessed with happiness. but it’s bullshit! we’re actually obsessed with NOT being happy: with acquisition, with envy, with drama, with falling (followed by redemption, and then probably falling again).

    we think happiness is boring, as a country, and that, i think, is a serious problem that should be addressed.

    but i agree there’s little point talking about love, partly because if you’re lucky enough to be in love you should shut up about it so that you don’t attract the evil eye.

  2. hi!

    i think i once, happy and in love, wrote a poem about love-induced happiness and how it’s boring.

    i agree with you about love as a shared experience being boring, but i actually think love as an individual feeling for another is fascinating. if that line in the sand makes any sense to you.

  3. Ester - It’s taken me this long to reply because I’ve been mulling over what you said. (Also yay for you commenting and linking!)

    I almost took the line about being uninterested in happiness out, since it felt like a non sequitur. I completely agree with you that we are told to be obsessed with other things that will supposedly bring us happiness but then never do - acquisition, falling, redemption. I would add to that list that we are supposed to be relentlessly seeking certain kinds of success - being thin, making money - as if once we get these things we will be happy, but then we are constantly told that we haven’t reached the target yet, so we don’t get to be happy yet.

    As odd as it sounds, I was kind of thinking of the Tolstoy quote at the beginning of Anna Karenina when I wrote it “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” Though having a quote from a famous writer doesn’t make me right, and on one level this statement is obviously not true - not all happy families can be the same. But how do you have a story without the drama of some kind of unhappiness? I think that quote is asserting that you can’t. Where does the conflict come from? What needs to be resolved? And I’m really asking you, since I know you love stories. You clearly can’t have a capitalist economy without a constant stream of messages about how we should be unhappy now but will be happy if we just buy this thing, but can you have a story?

    I’m going to think about this more.

    Off to brunch, with you! I love brunch so much.

Leave a Reply